I was told that all I have to do was deposit $375 and I would get a return in 7 days no questions asked and no additional investment required.

What happened: I put in $750 (immediately it became $710 in a place that claims there is no deposit fee)

Then I was told I needed to top it up to $2,000 (none of the provided screen-shots showed more than a $850 deposit)

Then after disputing with an agent for a full day she topped up the account to $2,000 which she claims is the minimum amount after 36 hours before stating it was $375!

She then told me that there would be a withdrawal fee of 10% which makes sense. I asked for clarification that this amount would be deducted from the profit amount which was verified. She is now telling me that I need to pay an ADDITIONAL $2,000 upfront to cover the withdrawal fee 100% in blind faith.

I’ve requested my original investment to be returned to me or profits dispersed with the withdrawal fee taken out from the profit or to take the trading fee out of the locked-in deposit but the only response I’m getting is “it’s already been traded pay $2,000 more and I swear we will disperse the profits!”

DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS COMPANY IT IS COMPLETE FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY!

I moved into Veazie Manor with B and L Properties in Veazie Maine in May of 2020 after looking around for places to rent from in the area. Several months after moving in a downstairs neighbor of mine had tracked down my mother through Facebook and falsely accused me of “illegally cutting down a tree” and stated that she and another tenant had witnessed this happen. I never cut down a tree and not really knowing what to do I went to the Veazie police department to see what I could do about this as she was accusing me of vandalism and they wrote down my story and kept it on record.

Some months go by and one day while I was at work in March of 2021 my girlfriend who had been living with me there at the time called me to let me know that another neighbor of mine was pounding on the walls so hard that it woke her up from a nap she was taking and when I attempted to call B and L about this they told me to “call the police” and hung up which I did not do because I was not looking to start issues and was only concerned for her well being as this was completely unlike her to be doing something like this.

2 or 3 weeks of this go by and several failed attempts to reach out to her and she is still pounding on the walls virtually every night until one morning at around 3:00 she sends another neighbor over to my door to tell me that I need to be quiet and insinuates that she is blaming the noise on me.

He also goes on to state that her and several other neighbors are concerned that one of my friends is going to rob her because he “has a criminal history of robbery” which he does not and that I “need to watch who I keep company with”. 2 or 3 nights later and I’m out of town when I get a call from yet another neighbor about how the neighbor that is banging on the walls is claiming that I had been noisy that whole night (which is physically impossible as yet again I am entirely out of town) and how she is “scared because of your friend that is going to rob her” and that she is “going to put a bullet in his skull” immediately after hearing this I called B and L properties who told me to call the main office about this situation in the morning as this call took place around midnight.

When I called them in the morning the landlord Peggy answered and when I began telling her what was happening she immediately placed blame on me without even hearing the entire story and said she would look into it but when I called her again several hours later she admitted to me that she was unable to get in contact with the neighbor who had been banging on the walls and got very aggressive with me for asking.

I ended up calling the police and notified the landlord of this and moved after this occurred and several days later got a call from the landlord apologizing to me for what had happened because “I spoke to the guy who knocked on your door and her shouldn’t have done that” totally ignoring the entire fact of police showing up to the residency and very odd events taking place there. At the end of it all I needed up receiving a letter from the company telling me that I had to pay for the last months rent of $775.

I was supposed to live the for 6 days in May which obviously did not happen due to death threats and odd, false accusations against my friend that were falling on me and they also threatened to sue me if I did not pay approximately $2,000 for a carpet cleaning, repainting and cleaning of the fridge along with couch disposal and a new lock a key set and they had also kept the security deposit of $800 or so which was specifically for the event of damages and things of that nature (which admittedly there was damage as a result of moving a very large tv downstairs by myself and I hit the walls with it and dropped it several times) but other than that the threatened lawsuit was completely unwarranted and never occurred but is still an issue as they were threatening me essentially because I no longer wanted to live under their management.

This company is dangerously and an ethically using US taxpayers money to pay a private court to go after Don Ziger. The judge is a close relation to CHEVRON!   They are doing this because they lost a huge lawsuit against Ecuadorians people over the damage they have caused.  

Chevron Is setting a very dangerous precedence here!!  It’s not acceptable and I will sing it to the top of my lungs I will not except this I will never spend a dime at a Chevron gas station until they leave him alone and stop this private court case with money that should be used for the American people NOT REVENGE!!! 

Sellers no matter what you do, do not do business with Peng Wong from Farmington Hills MI 48334. The first thing he will do is contact his credit card company and file an immediate dispute lying about everything just so that his credit card company can feel sorry for him. His bunch of lies makes him nothing but a two bit thief that is going to be brought up on both criminal and fraud charges. He will contact his bank Citibank and file a fraud dispute claiming he had cancelled the transaction.

On every single checkout screen of the site it says cancellations are not permitted and all sales are final. He will continue is load of lies by stating (1) saying your cancellation policies are not disclosed when you catch this lying POS on the invoice saying he was well about them not being allowed (2) he will make up fake delivery dates in which he does not have a shred of documented evidence to back up his load of lies (3) he openly admits he didnt contact the seller which by law he is required to and (4) he will continue his lies saying the very next day he cancelled the merchandise when he openly admits he just decided out of thin air to cancel it.

Wong thinks he can do whatever he wants, when his own bank sees how much a lying BS artist he is, he wastes no time into filing another dispute for the same reason. Despite 4 copies of the terms and conditions it clearly states the terms, he will continue to make up his lies. Dont even bother sending him collections notice because he will just ignore them. Wong your going jail count on it!

It started when a customer decided he didn’t want to pay according to the contract. So he turned us into cslb. That’s when they started fabricating lies throwing out evidence to clear contractor. The only thing cslb exists for is to steel from contractors.

You sign a settlement and cslb keeps adding more fees not in settlement. All contractors in their eyes are guilty. I had an investigator tell me that no contractor ever wins.

My name is Christian Shank i am writing in regards to Us Bank relia card, my account has been frozen for  three months now, I have called many different numbers as well as submitted all documents required a selfie of myself  numerous times and yet nothing has yet to be done to fix the issue. Everyone I have spoken to has been extremely rude and very unprofessional. My family and I are literally about to be homeless do to this issue and I just don’t understand why Nothing is being done to help, all I want is to be able to take care of my family.

https://www.lawtimesnews.com/news/general/fogler-rubinoff-sued-for-25m-over-alleged-conflict/258409

A Toronto law firm is facing a $25-million conflict of interest lawsuit in the latest twist in a protracted dispute over a building development.

In a new statement of claim filed with the Ontario Superior Court, brothers Vito and Joe Valela allege that Fogler Rubinoff LLP schemed with the Valelas’ former business partner, Philmor Goldplate Homes Inc., to force them out of a joint condo development in downtown Toronto. Dale Denis, a partner at Fogler Rubinoff, is also listed as a defendant.

The Valelas and their company, Valemont Group Ltd., started a separate action against Philmor and its principals back in 2003 after the collapse of their co-ownership of the Bloor Walk condo development.

Philmor retained Fogler Rubinoff to defend that action and launched a counterclaim, but the Valelas say it should have referred the case to another firm because it had already performed legal services on behalf of the co-ownership.

“The allegation is that before the complete breakdown in the relationship, the Philmor people were taking counsel from Fogler about how to extricate Valemont from the co-ownership,” says Stephen Edell, who is representing the Valemont Group in the new action.

“So it was not only that the lawyers found themselves in a conflict and breach of fiduciary duty, but the Valelas are alleging that during the course of the retainer, they were actively scheming with Philmor to further its agenda to squeeze Valemont out of the project.”

In an e-mailed statement, Martin Kaplan, the chairman of the litigation department at Fogler Rubinoff, dismissed the claim.

“The statement of claim issued by Valemont Group Ltd., Joe Valela, and Vito Valela against Fogler Rubinoff LLP and Dale Denis is entirely without merit and will be vigorously defended by the defendants to such claim,” he said. “We will make no further comments respecting this claim which is now before the court.”

The relationship between the Valemont Group and Philmor goes back to the 1990s, when they successfully completed a two-phase subdivision development in Mississauga. The trouble began after they purchased land near Bloor and Jarvis streets in Toronto and started work on the Bloor Walk development.

According to the statement of claim, high construction costs caused tensions in the co-ownership to mount around 2001. Joe Valela alleges Philip Macarz, one of Philmor’s principals, told him he “regarded [the Valemont Group] as the ‘weak link’ in the joint venture because it did not have significant capital to invest” and that he was “going to see the lawyers to figure out what to do about [the company] as the weak link.”

The Valelas say they agreed to use Fogler Rubinoff to provide legal services to the co-ownership around 1999 after Macarz suggested it because of his family’s long relationship with the firm. But in hindsight, they allege Macarz “introduced Fogler as the solicitors to the co-ownership to secretly learn about the co-ownership and its principals.”

Since they launched their action against Philmor in 2003, the Valelas accuse Denis of making “exaggerated and outrageous claims” in open court.

“Dale Denis counselled Philip Macarz to allege fraud against Joe Valela personally,” the brothers allege, adding it was an “abusive breach of trust and confidentiality for him to champion offensive allegations that concern Fogler’s own clients’ internal business dealings pre-2003 when it was purporting to be acting for the co-ownership.”

During the course of the litigation between the two companies, Philmor was able to take control of the Valemont Group’s interest in the Bloor Walk development in exchange for a $5.5-million bond posted in court so that the first phase of the development could go ahead with a different partner.

But in the new statement of claim, the Valemont Group is seeking $25 million in damages against Fogler Rubinoff to cover its legal costs, lost project-management fees and profits, and $1 million in punitive damages. None of the allegations have been proven in court.

Simon Chester, a partner at Heenan Blaikie LLP with expertise in legal conflicts of interest, says the rules on joint retainers may apply to co-ownerships because there is a lack of law on co-owner representation.

The Law Society of Upper Canada allows lawyers to work for more than one client in a matter as long as they both understand they have retained them and that “no information received from one party on the matter will be kept confidential from the other,” Chester says.

But when a conflict arises, the clients must understand that the lawyer “may not be able to act for either or both of them and may have to withdraw completely,” he adds. “On a co-ownership, one may say, ‘Let’s just use my law firm,’ and that’s absolutely fine as long as the other party realizes that it’s my law firm and they understand the ground rules as it proceeds.”

Chester notes the Canadian Bar Association strongly recommends that law firms have retainer letters and even goes as far as suggesting “I-am-not-your-lawyer” letters designed to clear up misconceptions when more than one person meets with a practitioner.

“The case may turn on whether Fogler actually had a retainer letter that said who the clients were and to whom the duties were owed,” Chester points out. However, Chester notes that Denis and Fogler Rubinoff have represented Philmor at least since 2004, a fact that may work against the Valemont Group.

“One thing you have to do is to act on your knowledge in a timely fashion. You can’t sit on a conflict and then bring it up years later.”

Chris Williams sold me  Olde English Bulldogge that was supposed to be registered with IOEBA.  After driving 1000 miles to pick her up, he said he misplaced her papers and would order new ones and send them to me. That was 9 months ago. I still have not received the papers.

Everytime I called he said they weren’t in yet but would overnight them as soon as he got them. Finally after a month he quit answering my phone calls and texts. He hasn’t even offered to negotiate a solution or anything. He will not respond to me anymore. The dog is an adult and was filthy and stinky. You could tell she was just in a kennel all her life. 

Premier Property Solutions LLC on the surface appears to be a legitimate property management service. They’ve been in business for over 10 years and have managed many buildings across the Boston area. But what began as cost-cutting measures and bad service eventually devolved in a full fledged criminal operation, in which property manager steal from tenants and forge bogus maintenance charges.

They’ll steal security deposits and condo fees. They won’t pay vendors and will pocked the money you pay them. This is one of the worst, most egregious scams that I’ve ever experienced

I bought a ticket from Kiwi.com (Cai-Ruh-Kwi) and paid for the full ticket in August 2021. They issued the ticket with Air-Cair airline from Cairo to Riyadh with a transit time of 2h 25 minutes. when I went to the airport I have been denied to check in because KSA doesn’t accept any transit passengers for few weeks and before I bought my ticket.

I have contacted the Airline (Air-Cairo) and they confirmed that Kiwi.com shouldn’t issue me a ticket because KSA doesn’t accept any transit passengers from Cairo to Kuwait. I’ve contacted Kiwi.com and they refused to issue me a refund and they claim that their ticketing team has confirmed that the layover time was sufficient while the airline themselves confirmed that there is no Transit at all.

I filed a dispute with my card company (PayPal) and Kiwi.com has not responded to the dispute leaving my refund in limbo, and it looks like I will never be able to get a refund. Unfortunately, Kiwi.com is a 100% scam Internet, never trust them and their agents.